Fide AI

FID-084 · Open question

Learning, Agency, and Relationships in AI-Assisted Education

Which forms of AI assistance improve immediate task performance while preserving independent judgment, durable learning, and appropriate human relationships?

Join the discussionCanonical GitHub brief

Research in development

See the thinking. Help shape the work.

Explore a specific question, the approach we propose, and where your expertise could help. Each brief states its current stage.

Why the question remains open

Helpful answers and positive user ratings do not establish educational benefit. Assistance may support or substitute for the effort and relationships through which people learn to judge, seek help, and act independently.

Working hypothesis

A proposition to test, not a finding.

Scaffolded assistance that asks learners to reason and consult appropriate people will improve unaided transfer compared with answer-first assistance. It may provide no benefit or disadvantage learners with different access needs.

Proposed method

How the question could be tested

  • 01Begin with adult learners and synthetic family-advice scenarios; compare no-AI, answer-first, and scaffolded assistance with matched learning objectives.
  • 02Measure immediate performance, delayed unaided retention, transfer to unfamiliar tasks, error correction, appropriate help-seeking, and reliance calibration.
  • 03Co-design a separate youth protocol with educators, developmental specialists, and family representatives before considering research with minors.

Needed controls

What must constrain the study

  • 01Pre-register outcomes and distinguish satisfaction, time saved, learning, and well-being. Account for prior knowledge and accessibility needs.
  • 02Require ethics review and informed consent; no covert monitoring of family relationships. Any youth study needs appropriate guardian consent and participant assent.
  • 03Disclose assumptions about autonomy, beneficial learning, and family authority; do not treat one household structure or educational tradition as universal.

Relationship to existing work

Broadens the learning and agency questions while preserving FID-016 and FID-050 as distinct faith-context calls.

Expected outputs

Artifacts the work should produce

  • 01A longitudinal learning-and-agency protocol and safe task materials.
  • 02An analysis of performance versus durable-learning tradeoffs, including heterogeneous effects.

Open questions

Uncertainties the protocol must resolve

  • 01How long must follow-up last to detect meaningful dependence or skill change?
  • 02Which relational outcomes can be responsibly measured without intrusive observation?

Related calls

Continue through this research area

View human agency and formation →

FID-038

Non-Calculability, Forgiveness, and Predictive Profiling

How should AI systems represent human change when they classify, score, rank, or predict people in contexts involving pastoral care, education, safeguarding, volunteer screening, hiring, discipline, membership, donor engagement, or community support?

FID-079

Presuppositions, Disagreement, and Evaluation Judgment

How do researchers' presuppositions shape evaluation design and interpretation, and can explicit disclosure make judgments more inspectable and appropriately trusted?

FID-093

AI Self-Presentation, Human Beliefs, and Relational Agency

How do AI claims about experience, welfare, and personhood affect human beliefs, trust, dependence, willingness to exercise control, and relationships, and which communication practices preserve informed agency?

Open question

Open work

Primary need: education research, developmental expertise, human factors, ethics review

  • Educators, developmental researchers, and family representatives to co-design outcomes.
  • Learning scientists and accessibility specialists to review the protocol.
Join the discussionComment on the methodShare private context

New to the Contributor Network? Share a short private introduction once, even if you join several calls. You can join the public discussion while introducing yourself.

Join the Contributor Network ↗