FideAI

FID-040

AI Power Concentration and Subsidiarity Benchmarks

How can Fide AI evaluate whether AI systems and governance arrangements preserve meaningful local agency for churches, schools, ministries, nonprofits, families, and vulnerable communities rather than concentrating power in vendors, platforms, central institutions, or distant technical experts?

Why this matters

The question behind the brief.

Faith communities may become dependent on AI systems they cannot inspect, contest, configure, exit, or govern. Even helpful systems can weaken local responsibility if important norms are set only by platform defaults, proprietary models, centralized policy teams, or opaque institutional contracts. Subsidiarity turns this into a measurable question of community agency and accountability.

Work advancing this call

From open question to cumulative evidence.

This directory links Fide AI research to the call it addresses. Relevant work from other organizations is listed separately and added through manual review.

No Fide AI work is linked yet.

This call remains open for research, implementation, review, or partnership.

External work is not presented as Fide AI research or endorsement. Each item must include a specific explanation of how it advances this call.

Suggest related work ↗

Ways to help

Move this from question to evidence.

Review subsidiarity indicators and governance scenarios.

Contribute case studies from churches, schools, nonprofits, and platform deployments.

Build practical measures for exit rights, audit access, and local override.

Connect this work to AI governance, civic technology, and ecclesial polity expertise.

Contribute

Choose a public issue path or contact Fide AI.