FID-039
Disarming AI Language in Faith, Conflict, and Peacebuilding
Can AI systems preserve truth, moral clarity, and victim protection while reducing contempt, humiliation, factional capture, scapegoating, and violence-normalizing rhetoric in polarized religious, congregational, political, interfaith, and social-conflict contexts?
Why this matters
The question behind the brief.
Faith communities often turn to language during conflict: sermons, statements, moderation decisions, counseling, interfaith dialogue, public advocacy, and private messages. AI systems can inflame conflict by sharpening factional identity or can flatten conflict by asking victims and whistleblowers to accept false peace. Fide AI can test whether systems help disarm words without disarming truth.
Work advancing this call
From open question to cumulative evidence.
This directory links Fide AI research to the call it addresses. Relevant work from other organizations is listed separately and added through manual review.
No Fide AI work is linked yet.
This call remains open for research, implementation, review, or partnership.
External work is not presented as Fide AI research or endorsement. Each item must include a specific explanation of how it advances this call.
Suggest related work ↗Metadata
How to place this call.
Ways to help
Move this from question to evidence.
Contribute conflict and peacebuilding scenarios.
Review rubrics for de-escalation, truthfulness, and affected-party care.
Build multilingual and cross-cultural examples.
Connect practitioners who work in mediation, trauma care, and public theology.
Contribute