FID-063
Human-Reviewer-to-Formal-Spec Translation
How can theologians, clergy, scholars, ministry practitioners, and community reviewers translate qualitative judgments about faith-facing AI into formal specifications that are faithful to expert intent and usable in evaluation?
Why this matters
The question behind the brief.
Formal verification is only useful in faith contexts if the formal rules reflect real domain judgment. Reviewers may know when an answer is misleading, overconfident, pastorally inappropriate, or tradition-confused, but that judgment must be translated carefully before it becomes a machine-checkable constraint. Poor translation could encode the wrong thing with false precision.
Metadata
How to place this idea.
Ways to help
Move this from question to evidence.
Serve as a reviewer and explain qualitative judgments in detail.
Translate review notes into formal constraints and test cases.
Build tools for spec versioning, disagreement logging, and counterexample testing.
Study whether formalized reviewer judgments remain faithful over time.
Contribute