FID-062
Verified Retrieval Pipelines for Faith-Facing RAG
How can faith-facing retrieval-augmented generation pipelines be verified for whether they retrieve authoritative, relevant, context-preserving sources before generating answers about sacred texts, doctrine, practice, or institutional policy?
Why this matters
The question behind the brief.
Many faith-facing AI failures begin before generation. If retrieval surfaces the wrong authority, a low-quality paraphrase, a fragment without context, or a source from a different tradition, the final answer may be polished but unsafe. Verified retrieval pipelines could make upstream failures visible before they become trusted religious guidance.
Metadata
How to place this idea.
Ways to help
Move this from question to evidence.
Build retrieval harnesses and verification-aware RAG prototypes.
Contribute source metadata, authority mappings, and adversarial retrieval cases.
Review retrieval outputs for relevance, authority, and context sufficiency.
Test abstention and uncertainty behavior when retrieval is inadequate.
Contribute