FID-045
Faith-AI Research Gap Map and Evidence Commons
What does the current AI ethics, safety, fairness, HCI, and evaluation literature actually study about religion and faith, what does it omit, and how should Fide AI maintain a living evidence map that guides future research rather than duplicating or overstating existing work?
Why this matters
The question behind the brief.
Recent public claims note that religious bias appears underexamined relative to other AI bias topics. Fide AI needs a disciplined way to verify such claims, track the field, identify neglected communities and methods, and help funders, researchers, and faith institutions see where new work is most needed. The first repo-native artifacts should be `research/sources.yaml`, `research/source-tags.yaml`, `research/reviews/`, and the reusable `templates/source-note.md` annotation template.
Metadata
How to place this idea.
Ways to help
Move this from question to evidence.
Contribute papers, datasets, and non-English sources.
Review taxonomy labels and coding criteria.
Build literature-search and evidence-map tooling.
Connect funders and researchers to neglected question areas.
Contribute